Part 1: Product vs. Company Footprints in Fashion: Understanding the Disconnect in Sustainable Manufacturing

‍Introduction: The Dual Challenge of Sustainability in Fashion

In today's fashion industry, sustainability is not just a buzzword—it's a business imperative. Consumers, regulators, and investors alike are demanding more transparency about the environmental impact of both the products they buy and the companies they support. Yet, many fashion brands and suppliers face a significant challenge: aligning the environmental footprint of their individual products with the overall footprint of their company.

The problem is that many brands approach these two aspects—product and company footprints—as distinct and separate efforts. This disconnect often leads to fragmented strategies, missed opportunities, and ultimately, a lack of meaningful progress toward sustainability goals. In this first part of our two-part series, we'll explore what product and company footprints are, why they matter, and how a lack of integration between the two can lead to unintended consequences.

What Do We Mean by Product and Company Footprints?

To understand the challenges fashion brands face, we first need to clarify the difference between a product footprint and a company footprint.

• Product Footprint: This is a measure of the environmental impact of a specific garment throughout its entire lifecycle—from raw material extraction and fabric production to manufacturing, transportation, use, and end-of-life disposal. For example, the product footprint of a cotton T-shirt includes the water used to grow the cotton, the energy consumed during dyeing and finishing processes, the emissions from transporting the shirt to a retailer, and the microplastics released during consumer washing.

• Company Footprint: This represents the total environmental impact of all the activities of a fashion brand or supplier. It encompasses everything from energy use in corporate offices and manufacturing facilities to transportation, packaging, waste management, and even the carbon footprint of employee commutes. For instance, the company footprint for a denim manufacturer includes not only the emissions and water use involved in producing jeans but also the electricity used in their headquarters, the waste generated in their supply chain, and the fuel consumed by delivery trucks.

While these two footprints are interconnected, they are often managed separately within organizations, leading to inefficiencies and lost opportunities for holistic sustainability.

Why the Disconnect?

Many fashion brands treat product and company footprints as independent silos, often because of organizational structures. The sustainability team may focus on overall company metrics, such as reducing emissions from office buildings or transitioning to renewable energy, while product development teams concentrate on minimizing the environmental impact of specific garments.

Consider a fashion brand that markets itself as sustainable by using organic cotton for its collections. The product team might successfully lower the water footprint of individual garments by switching to organic materials and employing eco-friendly dyes. However, if the company's factories are still powered by fossil fuels, the benefits at the product level could be significantly undermined by the overall carbon footprint of the company's operations. This misalignment can result in the brand's sustainability efforts falling short of their full potential.

The Consequences of Misalignment Between Product and Company Footprints

1. Environmental Impact: The most direct consequence of this misalignment is a higher overall environmental footprint. Even if a brand's products are designed to be sustainable, if the company's operational practices are not aligned, the net impact may still be negative. For example, a luxury fashion house might invest in biodegradable packaging to reduce the product footprint but fail to address the energy-intensive processes in its production facilities, which could result in a higher total carbon footprint than competitors with less sustainable packaging.

2. Regulatory Risks: As regulatory frameworks around the world become stricter, this misalignment can lead to compliance challenges. In the European Union, for example, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requires companies to disclose detailed environmental impact data, which must be consistent across both product and company levels. If a company focuses only on product-level data while neglecting broader operational impacts, it risks falling afoul of these regulations and facing penalties or sanctions.

3. Financial Consequences: Disconnected sustainability strategies can also have significant financial implications. Operating with inefficient practices in one area while improving another can lead to increased costs, such as higher energy bills or waste management fees. A brand that reduces water usage in its garment production but fails to implement energy-efficient practices in its warehouses may find that cost savings in one area are offset by expenses in another.

4. Reputational Damage: Misaligned footprints can damage a brand's reputation, particularly in an era where consumers are more informed and vigilant about greenwashing. According to a 2023 study by Fashion Revolution, 59% of consumers said they would stop supporting a brand if they found its sustainability claims to be misleading or inconsistent. If a brand claims its clothing line is "eco-friendly" but is found to have a high overall corporate carbon footprint, it risks losing consumer trust and market share.

5. Missed Opportunities: When brands fail to align their product and company footprints, they miss out on opportunities to drive innovation and gain a competitive edge. For example, by not integrating sustainable practices across both product design and company operations, brands may fail to capitalize on new materials, processes, or technologies that could enhance their overall sustainability profile. Competitors who take a more holistic approach may capture market share by offering products that are both environmentally friendly and transparently produced.

Why Alignment Matters: Creating a Holistic Sustainability Strategy

Aligning product and company footprints is not just about reducing emissions or meeting regulatory standards—it's about creating a coherent and comprehensive sustainability strategy that drives meaningful change. For fashion brands and suppliers, this means integrating sustainability into every aspect of their operations, from design and manufacturing to corporate governance and supply chain management.

For instance, a garment manufacturer could achieve greater alignment by shifting to renewable energy sources for its production facilities. This would reduce the company footprint while simultaneously lowering the carbon footprint of the garments produced. Similarly, investing in water recycling technologies in factories not only minimizes the company's overall water use but also supports product-level goals for sustainable production.

Looking Ahead: Building the Foundation for Part 2

In Part 2 of this series, we will explore practical steps that fashion brands and suppliers can take to better align their product and company footprints. We'll look at how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools can help provide a clear and comprehensive view of both footprints, and how brands can leverage this data to drive continuous improvement. We’ll also discuss the importance of cross-functional collaboration and integrated data systems in creating a more sustainable fashion industry.

By treating product and company footprints as interdependent, rather than isolated, fashion brands can improve their environmental performance, enhance their reputation, and ultimately gain a competitive edge in an increasingly eco-conscious market.

‍